• Share:
  • Send to Reddit
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Trader Joe's Practices Refreshingly Good Grammar

20090407-fewer.jpgWord nerds, you'll know what I'm talking about here.

While most grocery stores display the "10 Items or Less" sign in their express lanes, ol' Trader Joe must have had a prickly, knuckle-rapping grammar teacher. "Ten Items or Fewer" is the proper syntax.

The basic rule: If you can count it, use fewer; if you can't, use less.

This sign, blogged on the Brooklyn Heights Blog, appears in the Downtown Brooklyn TJ's location. I wonder if all express-lane signage throughout the chain is consistently correct.

23 Comments:

Yes. The Fearless Flyer is also refreshingly literate. It's encouraging to see that some people still care enough to do it right.

Oh, that rocks my world. Good grammar is yet another reason to love Trader Joe's. Few things disappoint me more than when someone types out "your" when they mean "you're."

Actually, my last sentence should read "Few things disappoint me more than when someone types out 'your' when HE/SHE meanS 'you're.'

@runnereater: D'oh! I'm going to state for the record now that if anyone finds any errors in my words above, it's an attempt at irony. Yeah, that's the ticket!

my two favorite things: grammar and trader joe's. more proof that trader joe's is amazingggggggg.

The sign is like this at the TJ's further from us, with the express lane. The closest one to us doesn't have one.

The worst thing for me is apostrophes that just show up in the middle of nowhere. "Ten items or less" is frustrating, "Ten item's or less" makes me murderous.

wegman's also has had the correct signs for a long time . i distinctly remember an elementary school teacher pointing it out on a field trip, and i'm about to graduate college.

I don't want to disappoint the Wholefoods haters out there, but my local Wholefoods has the grammar correct as well.

I live between a Whole Foods and a Trader Joe's. It's like living inside of my trusty Concise English Handbook.

Wegmans has had 10 items or fewer for years...about time Trader Joe's caught up..


Sorry..partial to Wegmans, being from Rochester, NY...

But most people at the grocery store CAN'T seem to count... At least the ones standing in the express lanes.

I'm happy to report that Publix express lanes employ proper grammar as well.

Nice. This grammar error has been a pet peeve of mine for a long time, as it is committed by many grocers both in my home community and in the places to which I routinely travel. Most of the time it does no good to point it out, as few clerks grasp the distinction. Those who do understand usually reply that they have little or no control over the signage in their stores...but my stock answer is that they are more likely to be able to speak to those who do have that control.

Yes, I am a curmudgeon...

If you can count it, use fewer; if you can't, use less.

... What makes you think most people can count that far........ 1, 2, many, a lot seems to be the average level of counting. Wasn't our ability to count the reason for for investing in sub-prime markets, stock plans, housing schemes, etc.

Anyway, as a British English speaker I would like to see colour written correctly but that ain't gone happen I guess.

Glad to see someone doing it right. I have finally had to let go of my longtime policy of boycotting businesses that use an apostrophe in the possessive its because misuse and error is so widespread. Sad indeed.

Some businesses are rather overzealous with their use of quotations...

Oh, the quotations kill me!

Excuse me if I don't jump on the chance to buy some "chicken" tacos.

Although, what the sign probably said was:

"Chicken" Taco's

I used to work at Sainsbury's, a UK Supermarket when I was at school. I worked on the checkouts and a customer used to come in on a regular basis and tell whoever was on the "ten items or fewer" checkout that it was wrong and needed to be changed. Nothing wrong with that, but over the years I worked there he must of told me 40 times, and it gets old.

You're all wrong. No, you're wrong.

Language Log addresses each of these issues many times besides the two that I linked. In fact some of those other treatments may be more complete. I just picked some of the first that I found. I hope you'll pardon me. I've got plenty of other grammar nazis to scold before dinner.

Besides these specific discussions, I recommending reading some of their general discussions about proscriptive linguistics.

yay stu! i am a staunch descriptivist and i think it bugs me to hear people talk about stuff like this more than the so-called 'bad grammar' bugs them.

Thanks goodness grammar nerds are still alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get it? "Thanks goodness?"

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.