• Share:
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Momofuku Ko: Does the Service Matter?

Or, 'Hi, My Name Is David and I'll Be Your Waiter Tonight'

20080506-kokokokokoko-oh.jpgWhen a Wall Street Journal reporter detailed her experience at Momofuku Ko and questioned her overall experience there, I thought it was an exercise in needless complaining. But then, on the eve of Frank Bruni's review, I started thinking about the service at Momofuku Ko and about what it says about where serious dining is going, and I decided that maybe she had a point—that, for a minimum of a hundred dollars a head, Ko should deliver on the promise of a welcoming, service-intensive experience where the diner feels well taken care of. Is that even possible when the cooks are doing the serving?

When you talk to Ko chef-owner David Chang and read about what he says about Ko, it's clear he wants the restaurant to be first and foremost about the food and the talented cooks who prepare and serve said food.

"Look," he told me, "we're trying to do something different here. When I was thinking about Ko, I didn't think much about the service. We want to have good service, we want people to have a good time, but not at the expense of our core values, which are all about the food. I think good service and hospitality are mutually exclusive. We are not going to be about customers having a bad day and taking it out on the chefs who work at Ko. If people have a problem with that, they should come talk to me about it—and if they don't like it, they don't have to come eat at Ko."

Where does that leave us, the serious eaters who want to eat well and feel well taken care of?

'A Satisfying and Singular Experience'

My only experience at Momofuku Ko was during friends and family rehearsals, which is all about ironing out the kinks in the food and the service, so I couldn't possibly render a conclusive judgment about either—though most of the food was undeniably delicious and groundbreaking, and I did feel well taken care of. So I started polling friends about their experience at Ko. The consensus was that eating there was a satisfying and singular experience and theatrical in its own minimalist fashion. Just about everyone I polled pointed out that it was unlike any other serious meal they had ever had.

The chefs serving the food were not particularly interested in explaining each dish beyond a perfunctory description, and they had little interest in starting a dialogue with the customers. Unlike, say, the Masa experience, which at $500 a head, a friend pointed out, diners should damn well feel well taken care of.

The question is: Can we eat delicious, groundbreaking, cook-centric food and feel well-taken-care-of at the same time? Is that even possible with cooks doing the serving? The cooks and chefs have a lot on their minds and so much going on that it may be too much to ask that they be concerned with their customers' well-being.

From Adam Platt's review in New York magazine:

"We charge cook's prices" is how Chang puts it to one of the patrons at the bar. He is standing with the rest of his cooks, who look the way top-line restaurant cooks usually do, which is to say pallid and harried, with assorted random baseball caps on their heads and their sleeves rolled up to give their burn marks full display. The first impression you get at Momofuku Ko, in fact, is that this is a kind of kitchen slave's revolt, an operation run by hypergifted line cooks for the benefit of their downtrodden, misunderstood, back-of-the-house brethren.

Chang and his cooks personally serve these dishes, giving dour, somewhat perfunctory descriptions of them, the way waiters at fancy restaurants are supposed to do.

'A More Natural Experience'

I spoke to Momofuku's Cory Lane, general managing partner of Ssäm Bar and a longtime front of the house person, about the service issue.

"I was a little nervous at first," Lane said. "Then I decided that they are cooks, and I'm going to let them do their thing. I think it gives customers a more natural experience. As a service-oriented person, I ventured into this with some preconceived notions, but in the end I think we provide a special experience at Ko that every person is going to respond to in his or her own way."

I am not being critical here. As many serious eaters know, I loved my meal at Ko. I'm just posing the question: What kind of service should we expect at Ko? Will Bruni bestow three stars on Ko, which is most assuredly a different kind of restaurant-going experience than the usual three-star restaurant? We'll know shortly.

Update: And Bruni's Ko review is up—three stars.

6 Comments:

Ed, this is an excellent write up. One of the best i've read recently on SE or elsewhere.

I think Ko, more than anything else and maybe more than most restaurants, is about the food. It's artfully prepared by guys who love what they are doing, and it clearly shows. Chang wanted a place to showcase the food, and he is giving his cooks the opportunity to produce what they made with their hands straight to the consumer.

Some people are going to get it, some people clearly get it, and some people won't ever get it.

Certainly a great topic of conversation. : )

i wish the cooks were more interested in discussing the dishes. i asked what the "vegetarian caviar" was three times and never got a definitive answer.

Though not a great one for formality, I do think it is important to be comfortable enough to enjoy your food. I'd love to try the food at Ko, and don't need to be pampered ,hovered over, or draped with fine linen. I don't need a long adjective-laden description of what I'm going to eat, and I'm happy to have whatever's being served. It all sounds like great fun.

But I can't hope to concentrate on/enjoy the food while sitting on a backless stool at a counter, because my back and legs will hurt the whole time. I know there are a lot of people like me in this regard, because I know many of them. personally. I guess it's so difficult to get in that another layer of exclusivity doesn't make a whole lot of difference.

But I think it would be a mistake to imply that any problem folks have with the setup is due to fussy pretentiousness or a need to be coddled. Real chairs are not extravagent- they have them at Bruegger's for heavenssake.

I think I lucked out by having David Chang there when i went, but it was very friendly service. David was cracking jokes with us and when I asked him how they made some dishes he was happy to get into a discussion. At one point we had two other diners involved in a conversation and David was telling us a story, from the other end of the kitchen one of his sous chefs stated "good story Dave" and the place busted out in laughter for a few minutes. I acknowledge this was unique and not the norm, but it certainly was a very relaxed, casual atmosphere with the highest caliber of food - which in a sense was a mind trick of some sort and makes it so unique. Other experiences I've had at a dining counter range from TKC @ Beacon to Degustation or even just a sushi bar, but this was different than all of them (closest to Degustation, but better food). I'll save up for another meal later in the year, but I fully know my experience with the service may be better or worse. Kudos to the Ko staff for a 3 star review.

I had great service there at Ko, but i cannot compare it to four star restaurants because I've never been to one. Maybe some people expect too much? Some may have this idea that "I am paying for service!"

No, I am sorry. You are paying for a product, or the right to try a product. It just so happens that expensive restaurants care about service because they know they are expensive and want patrons to come back. The price is tied to demand and rent rates, not to how well they feel customer services is, and what ppl would put up with.

Experience is so tightly tied to expectations, and I had high expectations of the food, and it was such an enjoyable experience. Maybe I did not go in expecting to be pampered, and that helped.

A great article, and obviously a restaurant with great food and talented chefs.

-----------------
"When I was thinking about Ko, I didn't think much about the service."
-----------------

But from an outsider (me), seeing this quote from the chef/owner is a bit troubling. And then to see him explain that he doesn't want good service to interfere with the "core values" makes it sound even worse. After all -- shouldn't good quality service be included as part of the "core values" ??

I get his point about the food. It's all about the food.

But shouldn't good service be a basic, fundamental element of most any long-term successful business, whether it's a fine restaurant or a muffler shop?

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.